Grading Myth 2: Grade Inflation

The myth of grade inflation is that we should design assessments not to measure criteria but to ensure some students receive higher grades, others lower grades.  However, criterion-referenced* classroom assessments can not score students relative to other students, even previous years; they were not designed for that purpose.  Skewing assessments to norm or rank students undermines the criterion validity and does little to inform teachers or students about how well they are working towards learning goals.

Telling children they are working toward goals, then surprising them with a competition is so obviously unfair, even children sense this instinctively.  As Rick Stiggins explains, “If you want to see students rapidly become hopeless failure acceptors, just set up an environment in which they actually learn a great deal but still receive low grades.  In a healthy, success-oriented classroom, if everyone succeeds, everyone receives a high grade” (297).

If the concern is that the assessment was too easy or too hard, the teacher should revisit the curriculum as a whole; then create authentic assessment that is aligned to the goals of the course and the way the instruction was presented.  Assessment, instruction, and curriculum should align (Biggs).  Simply making assessments harder cheats every child out of real curriculum. The all-too-common problem of an ELL placed in the wrong course with ability-inappropriate curriculum is not fixed by shaming students with bad grades, but rather modifications to curriculum as a whole.

 


*Note: Norm-referenced tests are the obvious exceptions. Post-secondary assessments could also present exceptions.


Biggs, J. (2012). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 39-55. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.642839

Kohn, A.  (November 2002). The Dangerous Myth of Grade Inflation.  The Chronicle of Higher Education. 49 (110): b7

Stiggins, R. (2005). Student-Involved Assessment for Learning. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. Print

Advertisements

Published by

Claire Walter

I am an ESL teacher and I promote differentiated, compassionate instruction and assessment for English Language Learners.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s