Talking to Administrators About Questioning

Observers and administrators require teachers to use frequent comprehension checks and questioning.  Teachers who use “a high frequency of questions” are given a higher score on teacher evaluations; teachers who ask fewer questions are penalized (Tennessee, 3).  In the SIOP Model, a teacher is praised for asking a question, then literally covering her mouth until a child answers (Echevarria, 103).  The lesson will not move on until someone answers.

39cd99d531aeccd977a99d03a3e23db2de8b698c537fd7416c629d3ff4ec777e

Avoid high-pressure forced response questions.  The more comprehension checking, the less students acquire (Krashen, 2011, 85).  Avoid interrupting with questions (Krashen, 2013), and simply read or listen to a story, then discuss what students enjoy without forced output in L2 (Mason; Lee).

Allowing creative, autonomous responses, ample time to reflect, and compelling, personal “shared interaction” levels the playing field for ELLs (Peyton).  For example, Nancy Atwell exchanges letters to discuss students’ favorite books.  Face-to-face oral Readers Conferences, open-entry Readers Notebooks, and student-led literary circle discussions are alternatives to teacher-created comprehension questions.

What book did you read today?  How do you feel about what you read?  What does this book inspire you to create or investigate?  In exemplary language classrooms, open dialogue about reading habits and authentic response to text replace “assign and assess” questioning (Allington, 743).


 

Cited:

Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading, and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Allington, R. (2002). What I’ve Learned about Effective Reading Instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 740-747.

Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. (2009). Making Content Comprehensible for  Elementary English Learners: The SIOP Model.  Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

Kittle, P. (2013). Book love: developing depth, stamina, and passion in adolescent readers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Krashen, S. (2011). Free Voluntary Reading. Libraries Unlimited.

Krashen, S. (2013). Read-Alouds: Let’s Stick to the Story. Language and Language Teaching, 3: 17. Retrieved from: http://sdkrashen.com/content/articles/2013_stick_to_the_story__.pdf

Langer, J., & Close, E. (2001). Improving literary understanding through classroom conversation. Albany, NY: Center on English Learning and Achievement.

Lee, S., Lee, M., & Krashen, S. (January 2014). Vocabulary Acquisition through Read-Alouds and Discussion: A Case Study. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(1): 2-6.

Mason, B. (2004). The effect of adding supplementary writing to an extensive reading program.  International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 2-16.

Peyton, J. (1985). Questions in ESL Classrooms: New Perspectives from Written Interaction (Publication). Washington D. C. : Center For Applied Linguistics.  Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED276256.pdf

Tennessee Department of Education. (2016). Tennessee Educator Acceleration Model. Retrieved from http://team-tn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/TEAM-General-Educator-Rubric-2016-171.pdf

Advertisements

Published by

Claire Walter

I am an ESL teacher and I promote differentiated, compassionate instruction and assessment for English Language Learners.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s